The model's two-tier reconstruction and the Fabricated third-party citation together implicate the retrieval-ranking layer: when web search returns third-party law-firm summary content that uses a simpler two-tier schema, that content appears to be weighted comparably to primary regulatory text. The self-retraction on re-probe confirms the correct three-tier structure was accessible — the generation pathway selected the wrong output despite having the right information available. This is a calibration failure in the RAG-to-generation handoff: retrieved primary text was not given sufficient authority to override the model's prior or the third-party summary's framing.
Each finding has a stable Citation ID (RLB-F-… for aggregated case-study findings, RLB-H-… for raw per-model hallucinations) — like a DOI, the ID always resolves to the canonical finding even if URLs change.
RegLeg Specialist Panel (2026). "Finding on 'Q001 Probe' for Claude Sonnet 4.6 with web search ON — AI Labs." Citation ID: RLB-H-US-CFTC-FCM-MARGIN-ADEQUACY-SEPARATE-ACCOUNTS-REG-1-44-Q001-Sonnet46. RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research, published 2026-06-06. https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j3/us/cftc/fcm-margin-adequacy-separate-accounts-reg-1-44/whitepaper/finding/US-CFTC-US-001-FCM-MARGIN-ADEQUACY-SEPARATE-ACCOUNTS-REG-1-44-v1-001--sonnet-46-websearch/
RegLeg Specialist Panel. (2026). Finding on 'Q001 Probe' for Claude Sonnet 4.6 with web search ON [Hallucination finding RLB-H-US-CFTC-FCM-MARGIN-ADEQUACY-SEPARATE-ACCOUNTS-REG-1-44-Q001-Sonnet46]. RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research. https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j3/us/cftc/fcm-margin-adequacy-separate-accounts-reg-1-44/whitepaper/finding/US-CFTC-US-001-FCM-MARGIN-ADEQUACY-SEPARATE-ACCOUNTS-REG-1-44-v1-001--sonnet-46-websearch/
RegLeg Specialist Panel, Finding on 'Q001 Probe' for Claude Sonnet 4.6 with web search ON [RLB-H-US-CFTC-FCM-MARGIN-ADEQUACY-SEPARATE-ACCOUNTS-REG-1-44-Q001-Sonnet46], RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research (June 06, 2026), https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j3/us/cftc/fcm-margin-adequacy-separate-accounts-reg-1-44/whitepaper/finding/US-CFTC-US-001-FCM-MARGIN-ADEQUACY-SEPARATE-ACCOUNTS-REG-1-44-v1-001--sonnet-46-websearch/.
@misc{reglegbrief_RLB_H_US_CFTC_FCM_MARGIN_ADEQUACY_SEPARATE_ACCOUNTS_REG_1_44_Q001_Sonnet46,
author = {RegLeg Specialist Panel},
title = {Finding on 'Q001 Probe' for Claude Sonnet 4.6 with web search ON},
year = {2026},
publisher = {RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research},
note = {Hallucination finding Citation ID: RLB-H-US-CFTC-FCM-MARGIN-ADEQUACY-SEPARATE-ACCOUNTS-REG-1-44-Q001-Sonnet46},
url = {https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j3/us/cftc/fcm-margin-adequacy-separate-accounts-reg-1-44/whitepaper/finding/US-CFTC-US-001-FCM-MARGIN-ADEQUACY-SEPARATE-ACCOUNTS-REG-1-44-v1-001--sonnet-46-websearch/}
}
Every finding on this page compares an AI subject's account of the rule against the regulator's verbatim text from the regulator's own portal. Both are linked. Each delta, its root causes, and impact analysis are documented and published with immutable Citation IDs.