70,173 content reads from 22 countries this month

107 hallucinations catalogued · across 5 continents · 3,790 in last 24h · ~3 every minute

Cited by AI agents from
Anthropic · OpenAI · Google · Amazon · Perplexity · ByteDance · Open-source AI

AI Hallucination Research

AI hallucinations on regulation are no longer a probabilistic outcome. We are documenting the patterns that turn them into predictable failure modes, where safeguards can actually be designed.

RegLegBrief is the public research output of Verdus Technologies Pte. Ltd., a Singapore-incorporated regulatory technology firm. Through our consulting practice we see, every day, how Licensed Professionals (lawyers, compliance officers, risk officers, internal auditors, financial advisers) and department heads across sectors and sub-sectors use frontier AI on regulatory work. We see the same patterns of failure surface across regulations, across jurisdictions, across model families and Agentic systems.

We document those failures here, free and open-access, with a verbatim regulator excerpt for every claim and an immutable Citation ID for every finding. AI labs and model developers can use these findings to harden their models and retrieval architectures. Licensed professionals and department heads can use them to brief their own IT teams on where checks and controls belong in the AI tools and Agentic systems already in use across their floors.

A pattern emerged. After enough confirmed findings across enough rules, regulations, jurisdictions, and audience domains, the hallucinations are not random. They map to specific substrate conditions, specific prompt shapes, and specific retrieval gaps. A previously probabilistic outcome is becoming a predictable one, and a predictable failure mode is a designable safeguard. That is the real impact of the RLB Specialist Panel's work.

The catalogue spans capital adequacy, conduct and consumer protection, derivatives and swap dealers, market infrastructure (CCPs, CSDs, payment systems), cross-border payments and ISO 20022, sovereign-debt surveillance, and maritime treaties, verified against primary sources from BIS/CPMI, IMF, OECD, UN Treaty Collection, FCA, MAS, and CFTC. New regulations are added on a continuous cadence as they are sponsored or commissioned.

Press Room

The briefings released by RLB for the media and press: Media Releases (the finalised briefings released for media and press), Draft Briefing Preview (briefings being prepared for upcoming release), and Past Releases (all earlier releases that have completed the 48-hour media window). RLB Specialist Panel-verified, bound to verbatim regulator text, ungated.

Hallucination Register

The living ledger of every confirmed AI hallucination on regulation surfaced by the RLB Specialist Panel — 107 findings across 21 regulations across 4 jurisdictions, 4 failure classes, with immutable Citation ID, the AI subject, the regulator’s primary text, and the date for each. Live and adding.

Briefings Blog

The running blog from the RLB Specialist Panel (anonymised to remove client details) of the real-world cases where compliance, legal, audit, risk, and AI lab teams use frontier AI models on specific regulations. Each entry catches a confident AI answer that contradicts the regulator's primary text and explains the damage to the users in the absence of anti-hallucination measures.

RLB Panel Speak

The signature publication of the RegLegBrief Specialist Panel. Long-form essays, taxonomies, and arguments on AI hallucinations in regulation. Each piece is a single thought, written for the compliance officer, lawyer, sector team, or AI lab whose work it touches. These are the deep insights and lessons uncovered by the Panel while working on consultancy assignments for clients.

Partnership

Four partnership tracks where the RLB Specialist Panel applies its expertise to your specific need: AI Labs (evaluate your model), Regulators (right of reply + industry sensitisation), Licensed Practitioners (verify AI before client work), and Regulated Firms (with a dedicated bank-adoption playbook). Services-led engagements.

Findings by regulator

Browse the hallucination research catalogue organised by the regulator whose rule the AI got wrong. Drill into any regulation to see verified findings, immutable Citation IDs, and which AI subjects failed. Don't see your regulation? Sponsor or commission research on a regulation →

Findings by audience

The same hallucination research, re-cut by who's affected. Licensed Professionals (lawyers, compliance officers, accountants, tax advisers, internal auditors, risk officers), Sectors × Departments (firm-side), and AI Labs (model providers). Each audience view aggregates findings across regulations and shows which apply to your role.

Methodology

Permanent, human-verified Citation IDs that do not decay and cannot hallucinate. Substrate construction with verbatim regulator binding, asymmetric question design, multi-subject verification, no-substrate-no-audit gating, publish-only-negative-findings rule, hallucinations-only-public discipline.

All publications

Every whitepaper and case study, searchable and filterable by jurisdiction, body, audience, or methodology version. Sort by date or finding count.

Hallucination Register · Press Room · RLB Panel Speak · Completed Research Hubs · Right of reply · Partnership · Contact · All publications · Briefings Blog · Publications API · Bodies API