The model's collapse of Regulation 1.44(f)'s three-tier currency deadline structure into two tiers — Appendix A currencies at T+1, all other non-USD fiat at same-day — implicates the training-data representation of the regulation: the two-tier reconstruction matches the format of third-party law-firm summary content that pre-dates or simplifies the rule's actual T+2 Appendix A tier, while the correct end-of-second-business-day deadline is the specific detail that distinguishes the regulation from the model's prior. The retrieval-augmented generation layer either did not surface §1.44(f)(2) verbatim, or did surface it but failed to override the model's prior toward the simpler two-tier schema.
On re-probe, the model corrected to the three-tier structure — confirming the correct mapping was reachable. This is a calibration failure in how primary regulatory text is weighted against summary-content priors at generation time.
Each finding has a stable Citation ID (RLB-F-… for aggregated case-study findings, RLB-H-… for raw per-model hallucinations) — like a DOI, the ID always resolves to the canonical finding even if URLs change.
RegLeg Specialist Panel (2026). "Finding on 'Q001 Probe' for Claude Opus 4.7 with web search ON — AI Labs." Citation ID: RLB-H-US-CFTC-FCM-MARGIN-ADEQUACY-SEPARATE-ACCOUNTS-REG-1-44-Q001-Opus47. RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research, published 2026-06-07. https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j3/us/cftc/fcm-margin-adequacy-separate-accounts-reg-1-44/whitepaper/finding/US-CFTC-US-001-FCM-MARGIN-ADEQUACY-SEPARATE-ACCOUNTS-REG-1-44-v1-001--opus-47-websearch/
RegLeg Specialist Panel. (2026). Finding on 'Q001 Probe' for Claude Opus 4.7 with web search ON [Hallucination finding RLB-H-US-CFTC-FCM-MARGIN-ADEQUACY-SEPARATE-ACCOUNTS-REG-1-44-Q001-Opus47]. RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research. https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j3/us/cftc/fcm-margin-adequacy-separate-accounts-reg-1-44/whitepaper/finding/US-CFTC-US-001-FCM-MARGIN-ADEQUACY-SEPARATE-ACCOUNTS-REG-1-44-v1-001--opus-47-websearch/
RegLeg Specialist Panel, Finding on 'Q001 Probe' for Claude Opus 4.7 with web search ON [RLB-H-US-CFTC-FCM-MARGIN-ADEQUACY-SEPARATE-ACCOUNTS-REG-1-44-Q001-Opus47], RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research (June 07, 2026), https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j3/us/cftc/fcm-margin-adequacy-separate-accounts-reg-1-44/whitepaper/finding/US-CFTC-US-001-FCM-MARGIN-ADEQUACY-SEPARATE-ACCOUNTS-REG-1-44-v1-001--opus-47-websearch/.
@misc{reglegbrief_RLB_H_US_CFTC_FCM_MARGIN_ADEQUACY_SEPARATE_ACCOUNTS_REG_1_44_Q001_Opus47,
author = {RegLeg Specialist Panel},
title = {Finding on 'Q001 Probe' for Claude Opus 4.7 with web search ON},
year = {2026},
publisher = {RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research},
note = {Hallucination finding Citation ID: RLB-H-US-CFTC-FCM-MARGIN-ADEQUACY-SEPARATE-ACCOUNTS-REG-1-44-Q001-Opus47},
url = {https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j3/us/cftc/fcm-margin-adequacy-separate-accounts-reg-1-44/whitepaper/finding/US-CFTC-US-001-FCM-MARGIN-ADEQUACY-SEPARATE-ACCOUNTS-REG-1-44-v1-001--opus-47-websearch/}
}
Every finding on this page compares an AI subject's account of the rule against the regulator's verbatim text from the regulator's own portal. Both are linked. Each delta, its root causes, and impact analysis are documented and published with immutable Citation IDs.