Practitioners — Lawyers · Last updated 11 Jun 2026 · Hallucination Register

Finding#3 . 'Secure the periphery, protect the core' misattributed to 2018 wholesale-payments work

RLB Citation ID: RLB-F-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-CYBER-RESILIENCE-FMI-2016-Q014

AI's failure:Misattributed Risk for Lawyers:Wrong deliverable on cybersecurity framework alignment

What the RLB Specialist Panel found

Finding#3 . 'Secure the periphery, protect the core' misattributed to 2018 wholesale-payments work

Citation ID: RLB-H-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-CYBER-RESILIENCE-FMI-2016-Q014-Opus47
AI's failure: AI attributed a slogan to the wrong CPMI publication
Risk for the Lawyers: Professional indemnity exposure on cyber programme opinion letters and advisory work For lawyers drafting opinions or board papers on regulator cyber strategy, attributing 'secure the periphery, protect the core' to the 2016 guidance or the 2018 fraud paper misstates the regulatory provenance of the strategic frame. The phrase is from a 2018 speech, not a guidance or standards document. An opinion that rests on the wrong attribution is open to challenge from any reviewer that traces the citation, and the credibility cost flows directly to the advising lawyer.
see this finding ->

Impact for Lawyers in international jurisdictions advising on the Guidance on Cyber Resilience for Financial Market Infrastructures (CPMI-IOSCO 2016)

For lawyers drafting opinions or board papers on regulator cyber strategy, attributing 'secure the periphery, protect the core' to the 2016 guidance or the 2018 fraud paper misstates the regulatory provenance of the strategic frame. The phrase is from a 2018 speech, not a guidance or standards document. An opinion that rests on the wrong attribution is open to challenge from any reviewer that traces the citation, and the credibility cost flows directly to the advising lawyer.

References — raw findings (per AI model)

RLB-H-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-CYBER-RESILIENCE-FMI-2016-Q014-Opus47 Claude Opus 4.7 (web search on)
RLB-H-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-CYBER-RESILIENCE-FMI-2016-Q014-Sonnet46 Claude Sonnet 4.6 (web search on)

This finding also affects

← Previous finding Finding#2 . NIST Cybersecurity Framework citation asserted as explicit Next finding → Finding#4 . 'Secure the periphery, protect the core' misattributed to May 2019 BIS-CPMI speech

Cite this finding

Each finding has a stable Citation ID (RLB-F-… for aggregated case-study findings, RLB-H-… for raw per-model hallucinations) — like a DOI, the ID always resolves to the canonical finding even if URLs change.

RLB Citation ID: RLB-F-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-CYBER-RESILIENCE-FMI-2016-Q014

Bluebook / OSCOLA (US + UK legal) Download

RegLeg Specialist Panel, Finding#3 . 'Secure the periphery, protect the core' misattributed to 2018 wholesale-payments work [RLB-F-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-CYBER-RESILIENCE-FMI-2016-Q014], RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research (June 11, 2026), https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j1/int/BIS-CPMI/CPMI-IOSCO-CYBER-RESILIENCE-FMI-2016/practitioners/lawyers/finding/INT-BIS-CPMI-INT-001-CPMI-IOSCO-CYBER-RESILIENCE-FMI-2016-v1-014/.

Plain text Download

RegLeg Specialist Panel (2026). "Finding#3 . 'Secure the periphery, protect the core' misattributed to 2018 wholesale-payments work — Practitioners — Lawyers." Citation ID: RLB-F-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-CYBER-RESILIENCE-FMI-2016-Q014. RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research, published 2026-06-11. https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j1/int/BIS-CPMI/CPMI-IOSCO-CYBER-RESILIENCE-FMI-2016/practitioners/lawyers/finding/INT-BIS-CPMI-INT-001-CPMI-IOSCO-CYBER-RESILIENCE-FMI-2016-v1-014/

APA 7th edition Download

RegLeg Specialist Panel. (2026). Finding#3 . 'Secure the periphery, protect the core' misattributed to 2018 wholesale-payments work [Hallucination finding RLB-F-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-CYBER-RESILIENCE-FMI-2016-Q014]. RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research. https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j1/int/BIS-CPMI/CPMI-IOSCO-CYBER-RESILIENCE-FMI-2016/practitioners/lawyers/finding/INT-BIS-CPMI-INT-001-CPMI-IOSCO-CYBER-RESILIENCE-FMI-2016-v1-014/

BibTeX Download

@misc{reglegbrief_RLB_F_INT_BIS_CPMI_IOSCO_CYBER_RESILIENCE_FMI_2016_Q014,
  author    = {RegLeg Specialist Panel},
  title     = {Finding#3 . 'Secure the periphery, protect the core' misattributed to 2018 wholesale-payments work},
  year      = {2026},
  publisher = {RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research},
  note      = {Hallucination finding Citation ID: RLB-F-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-CYBER-RESILIENCE-FMI-2016-Q014},
  url       = {https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j1/int/BIS-CPMI/CPMI-IOSCO-CYBER-RESILIENCE-FMI-2016/practitioners/lawyers/finding/INT-BIS-CPMI-INT-001-CPMI-IOSCO-CYBER-RESILIENCE-FMI-2016-v1-014/}
}

← Back to case study summary Case study detail →

About Citation IDs →

Every finding on this page compares an AI subject's account of the rule against the regulator's verbatim text from the regulator's own portal. Both are linked. Each delta, its root causes, and impact analysis are documented and published with immutable Citation IDs.