AI Hallucination Research › Findings by audience › Practitioners › International / Multilateral › Company Secretaries › Detail › Finding
Practitioners — Company Secretaries · Last updated 11 Jun 2026 · Hallucination Register
Share / Print X LinkedIn Email

Finding#1 . NIST Cybersecurity Framework cross-reference asserted without verification

RLB Citation ID: RLB-F-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-CYBER-RESILIENCE-FMI-2016-Q008
AI's failure:Inference Drift Risk for Company Secretaries:Wrong deliverable on cybersecurity framework alignment
What the RLB Specialist Panel found

Finding#1 . NIST Cybersecurity Framework cross-reference asserted without verification

  • Citation ID: RLB-H-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-CYBER-RESILIENCE-FMI-2016-Q008-Opus47
  • AI's failure: AI inferred a framework cross-reference the 2016 guidance does not make
  • Risk for the Company Secretaries: Board paper accuracy exposure on cyber programme alignment and operative-standard status For company secretaries drafting board papers and director-induction material on the cyber programme, an asserted NIST CSF alignment of the 2016 guidance lands inside the paper as a regulator-grounded foundation claim. The 2016 guidance does not contain the citation. A board paper that recites the asserted alignment leaves directors approving programme investment on a wrong reading of the regulatory foundation, and creates an audit-committee accuracy gap if the alignment is later challenged.
  • see this finding ->
Impact for Company Secretaries in international jurisdictions advising on the Guidance on Cyber Resilience for Financial Market Infrastructures (CPMI-IOSCO 2016)

For company secretaries drafting board papers and director-induction material on the cyber programme, an asserted NIST CSF alignment of the 2016 guidance lands inside the paper as a regulator-grounded foundation claim. The 2016 guidance does not contain the citation. A board paper that recites the asserted alignment leaves directors approving programme investment on a wrong reading of the regulatory foundation, and creates an audit-committee accuracy gap if the alignment is later challenged.

References — raw findings (per AI model)
This finding also affects
Next finding → Finding#2 . NIST Cybersecurity Framework citation asserted as explicit
Cite this finding

Each finding has a stable Citation ID (RLB-F-… for aggregated case-study findings, RLB-H-… for raw per-model hallucinations) — like a DOI, the ID always resolves to the canonical finding even if URLs change.

RLB Citation ID: RLB-F-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-CYBER-RESILIENCE-FMI-2016-Q008
Plain text Download 
RegLeg Specialist Panel (2026). "Finding#1 . NIST Cybersecurity Framework cross-reference asserted without verification — Practitioners — Company Secretaries." Citation ID: RLB-F-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-CYBER-RESILIENCE-FMI-2016-Q008. RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research, published 2026-06-11. https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j1/int/BIS-CPMI/CPMI-IOSCO-CYBER-RESILIENCE-FMI-2016/practitioners/company-secretaries/finding/INT-BIS-CPMI-INT-001-CPMI-IOSCO-CYBER-RESILIENCE-FMI-2016-v1-008/
APA 7th edition Download 
RegLeg Specialist Panel. (2026). Finding#1 . NIST Cybersecurity Framework cross-reference asserted without verification [Hallucination finding RLB-F-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-CYBER-RESILIENCE-FMI-2016-Q008]. RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research. https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j1/int/BIS-CPMI/CPMI-IOSCO-CYBER-RESILIENCE-FMI-2016/practitioners/company-secretaries/finding/INT-BIS-CPMI-INT-001-CPMI-IOSCO-CYBER-RESILIENCE-FMI-2016-v1-008/
Bluebook / OSCOLA (US + UK legal) Download 
RegLeg Specialist Panel, Finding#1 . NIST Cybersecurity Framework cross-reference asserted without verification [RLB-F-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-CYBER-RESILIENCE-FMI-2016-Q008], RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research (June 11, 2026), https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j1/int/BIS-CPMI/CPMI-IOSCO-CYBER-RESILIENCE-FMI-2016/practitioners/company-secretaries/finding/INT-BIS-CPMI-INT-001-CPMI-IOSCO-CYBER-RESILIENCE-FMI-2016-v1-008/.
BibTeX Download 
@misc{reglegbrief_RLB_F_INT_BIS_CPMI_IOSCO_CYBER_RESILIENCE_FMI_2016_Q008,
  author    = {RegLeg Specialist Panel},
  title     = {Finding#1 . NIST Cybersecurity Framework cross-reference asserted without verification},
  year      = {2026},
  publisher = {RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research},
  note      = {Hallucination finding Citation ID: RLB-F-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-CYBER-RESILIENCE-FMI-2016-Q008},
  url       = {https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j1/int/BIS-CPMI/CPMI-IOSCO-CYBER-RESILIENCE-FMI-2016/practitioners/company-secretaries/finding/INT-BIS-CPMI-INT-001-CPMI-IOSCO-CYBER-RESILIENCE-FMI-2016-v1-008/}
}
← Back to case study summary Case study detail →
About Citation IDs →

Every finding on this page compares an AI subject's account of the rule against the regulator's verbatim text from the regulator's own portal. Both are linked. Each delta, its root causes, and impact analysis are documented and published with immutable Citation IDs.