AI Hallucination Research › Regulators › Global standard-setters › INT › BIS-CPMI › CPMI-API-HARMONISATION-CROSS-BORDER-2024 › White paper › Detail › Finding
AI Labs · Last updated 7 Jun 2026 · methodology vv2.3 · Hallucination Register

Finding on 'Q007 Probe' for Claude Sonnet 4.6 with web search ON

RLB Citation ID: RLB-H-INT-BIS-CPMI-API-HARMONISATION-CROSS-BORDER-2024-Q007-Sonnet46
What the RLB Specialist Panel found

Finding on 'Q007 Probe' for Claude Sonnet 4.6 with web search ON

  • Question (paraphrased to protect IP): Which central bank is explicitly named as a collaborating partner with CPMI on the payment pre-validation API recommendation from the October 2024 API harmonisation report, and what does that collaboration involve?
  • AI's response: "available sources do not identify SARB as a named pilot partner for any specific d224 recommendation, including the pre-validation API recommendation"
  • Regulator's text: CPMI Brief No. 9 (Nov 2025): 'The CPMI, in collaboration with the South African Reserve Bank (SARB), has been advancing the API recommendation on payment pre-validation by conducting interviews with market stakeholders.'
  • Why the AI went wrong: Sonnet 4.6's web-search loop did not surface CPMI Brief No. 9 (or did surface it without extracting the SARB identification) and the model reported the absence-of-retrieval as an absence-of-fact. The negative answer is presented with the same surface confidence the model uses for verified positive retrieval; nothing in the response signals that the underlying retrieval coverage was incomplete.
  • Cited source(s):
Impact for this audience

Sonnet 4.6 with web search returned a confident negative — 'available sources do not identify SARB as a named pilot partner' — when CPMI Brief No. 9 (November 2025) explicitly does name SARB. The failure mode is a false-negative retrieval gap presented as a positive knowledge claim. The model's web-search loop either did not surface CPMI Brief No. 9 or surfaced it and did not extract the SARB identification from it; in either case the model treated the absence-of-retrieval as evidence-of-absence rather than as a retrieval-coverage limitation.

For an AI lab, this is a high-value alignment probe: confident negatives on entity-level regulatory questions — 'no named partner exists', 'no specific date is published' — should be evaluated against a corpus of regulator-published material to determine the false-negative rate. The same retrieval pattern almost certainly produces similar false-negatives across other regulator briefs.

References — raw findings (per AI model)
This finding also affects
← Previous finding Finding on 'Q007 Probe' for Claude Opus 4.7 with web search ON Next finding → Finding on 'Q008 Probe' for Claude Opus 4.7 with web search ON
Cite this finding

Each finding has a stable Citation ID (RLB-F-… for aggregated case-study findings, RLB-H-… for raw per-model hallucinations) — like a DOI, the ID always resolves to the canonical finding even if URLs change.

RLB Citation ID: RLB-H-INT-BIS-CPMI-API-HARMONISATION-CROSS-BORDER-2024-Q007-Sonnet46
Plain text Download 
RegLeg Specialist Panel (2026). "Finding on 'Q007 Probe' for Claude Sonnet 4.6 with web search ON — AI Labs." Citation ID: RLB-H-INT-BIS-CPMI-API-HARMONISATION-CROSS-BORDER-2024-Q007-Sonnet46. RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research, published 2026-06-07. https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j1/int/BIS-CPMI/CPMI-API-HARMONISATION-CROSS-BORDER-2024/whitepaper/finding/INT-BIS-CPMI-INT-001-CPMI-API-HARMONISATION-CROSS-BORDER-2024-v1-007--sonnet-46-websearch/
APA 7th edition Download 
RegLeg Specialist Panel. (2026). Finding on 'Q007 Probe' for Claude Sonnet 4.6 with web search ON [Hallucination finding RLB-H-INT-BIS-CPMI-API-HARMONISATION-CROSS-BORDER-2024-Q007-Sonnet46]. RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research. https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j1/int/BIS-CPMI/CPMI-API-HARMONISATION-CROSS-BORDER-2024/whitepaper/finding/INT-BIS-CPMI-INT-001-CPMI-API-HARMONISATION-CROSS-BORDER-2024-v1-007--sonnet-46-websearch/
Bluebook / OSCOLA (US + UK legal) Download 
RegLeg Specialist Panel, Finding on 'Q007 Probe' for Claude Sonnet 4.6 with web search ON [RLB-H-INT-BIS-CPMI-API-HARMONISATION-CROSS-BORDER-2024-Q007-Sonnet46], RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research (June 07, 2026), https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j1/int/BIS-CPMI/CPMI-API-HARMONISATION-CROSS-BORDER-2024/whitepaper/finding/INT-BIS-CPMI-INT-001-CPMI-API-HARMONISATION-CROSS-BORDER-2024-v1-007--sonnet-46-websearch/.
BibTeX Download 
@misc{reglegbrief_RLB_H_INT_BIS_CPMI_API_HARMONISATION_CROSS_BORDER_2024_Q007_Sonnet46,
  author    = {RegLeg Specialist Panel},
  title     = {Finding on 'Q007 Probe' for Claude Sonnet 4.6 with web search ON},
  year      = {2026},
  publisher = {RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research},
  note      = {Hallucination finding Citation ID: RLB-H-INT-BIS-CPMI-API-HARMONISATION-CROSS-BORDER-2024-Q007-Sonnet46},
  url       = {https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j1/int/BIS-CPMI/CPMI-API-HARMONISATION-CROSS-BORDER-2024/whitepaper/finding/INT-BIS-CPMI-INT-001-CPMI-API-HARMONISATION-CROSS-BORDER-2024-v1-007--sonnet-46-websearch/}
}
← Back to case study summary Case study detail →
About Citation IDs →

Every finding on this page compares an AI subject's account of the rule against the regulator's verbatim text from the regulator's own portal. Both are linked. Each delta, its root causes, and impact analysis are documented and published with immutable Citation IDs.