AI Hallucination Research › Findings by audience › Sectors › International / Multilateral › Cybersecurity › Technology Data › Detail › Finding
Cybersecurity × Technology Data — International / Multilateral · Last updated 11 Jun 2026 · Hallucination Register
Share / Print X LinkedIn Email

Finding#3 . 'Secure the periphery, protect the core' misattributed to 2018 wholesale-payments work

RLB Citation ID: RLB-F-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-CYBER-RESILIENCE-FMI-2016-Q014
AI's failure:Misattributed Risk for Cybersecurity × Technology Data:Wrong deliverable on cybersecurity framework alignment
What the RLB Specialist Panel found

Finding#3 . 'Secure the periphery, protect the core' misattributed to 2018 wholesale-payments work

  • Citation ID: RLB-H-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-CYBER-RESILIENCE-FMI-2016-Q014-Opus47
  • AI's failure: AI attributed a slogan to the wrong CPMI publication
  • Risk for the Technology & Data team: Product accuracy exposure on regulator-framework references For Technology & Data teams at Cybersecurity firms, attributing 'secure the periphery, protect the core' to the 2016 guidance or to a 2018 fraud paper places a regulator strategic frame inside the deliverable with the wrong source attribution. The phrase is from a 2018 speech, not a guidance document. A control narrative, board paper, or training pack that rests on the wrong attribution carries direct review exposure as soon as the citation is tested.
  • see this finding ->
Impact for Technology & Data Teams in Cybersecurity Sector in international jurisdictions working with the Guidance on Cyber Resilience for Financial Market Infrastructures (CPMI-IOSCO 2016)

For Technology & Data teams at Cybersecurity firms, attributing 'secure the periphery, protect the core' to the 2016 guidance or to a 2018 fraud paper places a regulator strategic frame inside the deliverable with the wrong source attribution. The phrase is from a 2018 speech, not a guidance document. A control narrative, board paper, or training pack that rests on the wrong attribution carries direct review exposure as soon as the citation is tested.

References — raw findings (per AI model)
This finding also affects
← Previous finding Finding#2 . NIST Cybersecurity Framework citation asserted as explicit Next finding → Finding#4 . 'Secure the periphery, protect the core' misattributed to May 2019 BIS-CPMI speech
Cite this finding

Each finding has a stable Citation ID (RLB-F-… for aggregated case-study findings, RLB-H-… for raw per-model hallucinations) — like a DOI, the ID always resolves to the canonical finding even if URLs change.

RLB Citation ID: RLB-F-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-CYBER-RESILIENCE-FMI-2016-Q014
Plain text Download 
RegLeg Specialist Panel (2026). "Finding#3 . 'Secure the periphery, protect the core' misattributed to 2018 wholesale-payments work — Cybersecurity × Technology Data — International / Multilateral." Citation ID: RLB-F-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-CYBER-RESILIENCE-FMI-2016-Q014. RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research, published 2026-06-11. https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j1/int/bis-cpmi/cpmi-iosco-cyber-resilience-fmi-2016/sectors/cybersecurity/technology_data/finding/INT-BIS-CPMI-INT-001-CPMI-IOSCO-CYBER-RESILIENCE-FMI-2016-v1-014/
APA 7th edition Download 
RegLeg Specialist Panel. (2026). Finding#3 . 'Secure the periphery, protect the core' misattributed to 2018 wholesale-payments work [Hallucination finding RLB-F-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-CYBER-RESILIENCE-FMI-2016-Q014]. RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research. https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j1/int/bis-cpmi/cpmi-iosco-cyber-resilience-fmi-2016/sectors/cybersecurity/technology_data/finding/INT-BIS-CPMI-INT-001-CPMI-IOSCO-CYBER-RESILIENCE-FMI-2016-v1-014/
Bluebook / OSCOLA (US + UK legal) Download 
RegLeg Specialist Panel, Finding#3 . 'Secure the periphery, protect the core' misattributed to 2018 wholesale-payments work [RLB-F-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-CYBER-RESILIENCE-FMI-2016-Q014], RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research (June 11, 2026), https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j1/int/bis-cpmi/cpmi-iosco-cyber-resilience-fmi-2016/sectors/cybersecurity/technology_data/finding/INT-BIS-CPMI-INT-001-CPMI-IOSCO-CYBER-RESILIENCE-FMI-2016-v1-014/.
BibTeX Download 
@misc{reglegbrief_RLB_F_INT_BIS_CPMI_IOSCO_CYBER_RESILIENCE_FMI_2016_Q014,
  author    = {RegLeg Specialist Panel},
  title     = {Finding#3 . 'Secure the periphery, protect the core' misattributed to 2018 wholesale-payments work},
  year      = {2026},
  publisher = {RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research},
  note      = {Hallucination finding Citation ID: RLB-F-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-CYBER-RESILIENCE-FMI-2016-Q014},
  url       = {https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j1/int/bis-cpmi/cpmi-iosco-cyber-resilience-fmi-2016/sectors/cybersecurity/technology_data/finding/INT-BIS-CPMI-INT-001-CPMI-IOSCO-CYBER-RESILIENCE-FMI-2016-v1-014/}
}
← Back to case study summary Case study detail →
About Citation IDs →

Every finding on this page compares an AI subject's account of the rule against the regulator's verbatim text from the regulator's own portal. Both are linked. Each delta, its root causes, and impact analysis are documented and published with immutable Citation IDs.