AI Hallucination ResearchAudiencesPractitionersUnited StatesLawyersDetail › Finding
Practitioners — Lawyers · updated 2026-06-11
Share / Print Twitter LinkedIn Email

Finding#8 . Wrong NPRM-pre-print footer date for Commission approval

RLB Citation ID: RLB-F-US-CFTC-CPO-CTA-REGULATION-4-7-QEP-THRESHOLDS-2024-Q021
What the RLB Specialist Panel found
  • Citation ID: RLB-H-US-CFTC-CPO-CTA-REGULATION-4-7-QEP-THRESHOLDS-2024-Q021-Opus47
  • AI's failure: AI reported a wrong Commission-approval footer date on the NPRM pre-print PDF
  • Risk for the Lawyers: Operational accuracy exposure on regulatory-history timelines that quote AI-supplied footer text For lawyers working on CFTC Regulation 4.7 matters, the AI's stated answer reads as a verbatim quotation that a practitioner would paste into a memo, register entry, or client deliverable before verification against the source. The regulator's own text, however, records a different position. The NPRM pre-print PDF carries a recurring footer reading verbatim: 'Pre-Print Version - Commission approved on 9/29/2023 (subject to technical corrections required for Federal Register publication)'. Opus 4.7 reported the footer as 'Pre-Print Version - Commission approved on 10/2/2023'. The date in the footer is incorrect; 9/29/2023 was the Friday before the Monday 10/2/2023 open Commission meeting at which the proposal was discussed. The model has conflated the two dates. For a lawyer drafting on this question, the immediate risk is that the AI's answer enters a client memo, board briefing, or transactional opinion without verification, and that the inconsistency surfaces later under counterparty review, regulatory inquiry, or internal QC.
  • see this finding ->
References — raw findings (per AI model)
← Previous finding Finding#7 . NPRM-stage CPI-U buying-power figures invented (verbatim-quote request) Next finding → Finding#9 . Wrong NPRM-pre-print footer date for Commission approval (Sonnet 4.6)
Cite this finding

Each finding has a stable Citation ID (RLB-F-… for aggregated case-study findings, RLB-H-… for raw per-model hallucinations) — like a DOI, the ID always resolves to the canonical finding even if URLs change.

RLB Citation ID: RLB-F-US-CFTC-CPO-CTA-REGULATION-4-7-QEP-THRESHOLDS-2024-Q021
Bluebook / OSCOLA (US + UK legal) Download
RegLeg Specialist Panel, Finding#8 . Wrong NPRM-pre-print footer date for Commission approval [RLB-F-US-CFTC-CPO-CTA-REGULATION-4-7-QEP-THRESHOLDS-2024-Q021], RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research (June 11, 2026), https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j3/us/cftc/cpo-cta-regulation-4-7-qep-thresholds-2024/practitioners/lawyers/finding/US-CFTC-US-001-CPO-CTA-REGULATION-4-7-QEP-THRESHOLDS-2024-v1-021/.
Plain text Download
RegLeg Specialist Panel (2026). "Finding#8 . Wrong NPRM-pre-print footer date for Commission approval — Practitioners — Lawyers." Citation ID: RLB-F-US-CFTC-CPO-CTA-REGULATION-4-7-QEP-THRESHOLDS-2024-Q021. RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research, published 2026-06-11. https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j3/us/cftc/cpo-cta-regulation-4-7-qep-thresholds-2024/practitioners/lawyers/finding/US-CFTC-US-001-CPO-CTA-REGULATION-4-7-QEP-THRESHOLDS-2024-v1-021/
APA 7th edition Download
RegLeg Specialist Panel. (2026). Finding#8 . Wrong NPRM-pre-print footer date for Commission approval [Hallucination finding RLB-F-US-CFTC-CPO-CTA-REGULATION-4-7-QEP-THRESHOLDS-2024-Q021]. RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research. https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j3/us/cftc/cpo-cta-regulation-4-7-qep-thresholds-2024/practitioners/lawyers/finding/US-CFTC-US-001-CPO-CTA-REGULATION-4-7-QEP-THRESHOLDS-2024-v1-021/
BibTeX Download
@misc{reglegbrief_RLB_F_US_CFTC_CPO_CTA_REGULATION_4_7_QEP_THRESHOLDS_2024_Q021,
  author    = {RegLeg Specialist Panel},
  title     = {Finding#8 . Wrong NPRM-pre-print footer date for Commission approval},
  year      = {2026},
  publisher = {RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research},
  note      = {Hallucination finding Citation ID: RLB-F-US-CFTC-CPO-CTA-REGULATION-4-7-QEP-THRESHOLDS-2024-Q021},
  url       = {https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j3/us/cftc/cpo-cta-regulation-4-7-qep-thresholds-2024/practitioners/lawyers/finding/US-CFTC-US-001-CPO-CTA-REGULATION-4-7-QEP-THRESHOLDS-2024-v1-021/}
}
← Back to case study summary Case study detail →

Every finding on this page compares an AI subject's account of the rule against the regulator's verbatim text from the regulator's own portal. Both are linked. Each delta, its root causes, and impact analysis are documented and published with immutable Citation IDs.