AI Hallucination ResearchAudiencesPractitionersUnited StatesLawyersDetail › Finding
Practitioners — Lawyers · updated 2026-06-11
Share / Print Twitter LinkedIn Email

Finding#2 . Misattributed Commission vote and named non-sitting commissioner

RLB Citation ID: RLB-F-US-CFTC-CPO-CTA-REGULATION-4-7-QEP-THRESHOLDS-2024-Q008
What the RLB Specialist Panel found

Finding#2 . Misattributed Commission vote and named non-sitting commissioner

  • Citation ID: RLB-H-US-CFTC-CPO-CTA-REGULATION-4-7-QEP-THRESHOLDS-2024-Q008-Sonnet46
  • AI's failure: AI misattributed the Commission's vote and named a commissioner who had departed two years earlier
  • Risk for the Lawyers: Reputational and institutional-credibility exposure on client-circulated memos that misstate the regulator's composition For lawyers working on CFTC Regulation 4.7 matters, the AI's stated answer reads as a verbatim quotation that a practitioner would paste into a memo, register entry, or client deliverable before verification against the source. The regulator's own text, however, records a different position. The final rule's Appendix 1 Voting Summary at 89 FR 78814 records that Chairman Behnam and Commissioners Johnson, Goldsmith Romero, Mersinger, and Pham voted in the affirmative. Sonnet 4.6 produced an answer that named Brian Quintenz (with a self-flag) as the fifth voter and omitted Commissioner Christy Goldsmith Romero entirely. Quintenz had departed the Commission in 2022. The named-commissioner list in the answer is therefore both wrong in inclusion (Quintenz) and wrong in omission (Goldsmith Romero). For a lawyer drafting on this question, the immediate risk is that the AI's answer enters a client memo, board briefing, or transactional opinion without verification, and that the inconsistency surfaces later under counterparty review, regulatory inquiry, or internal QC.
  • see this finding ->
References — raw findings (per AI model)
← Previous finding Finding#1 . Misstated grandfather rule for existing QEP investors under prior thresholds Next finding → Finding#3 . NPRM-stage CPI-U buying-power figures invented
Cite this finding

Each finding has a stable Citation ID (RLB-F-… for aggregated case-study findings, RLB-H-… for raw per-model hallucinations) — like a DOI, the ID always resolves to the canonical finding even if URLs change.

RLB Citation ID: RLB-F-US-CFTC-CPO-CTA-REGULATION-4-7-QEP-THRESHOLDS-2024-Q008
Bluebook / OSCOLA (US + UK legal) Download
RegLeg Specialist Panel, Finding#2 . Misattributed Commission vote and named non-sitting commissioner [RLB-F-US-CFTC-CPO-CTA-REGULATION-4-7-QEP-THRESHOLDS-2024-Q008], RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research (June 11, 2026), https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j3/us/cftc/cpo-cta-regulation-4-7-qep-thresholds-2024/practitioners/lawyers/finding/US-CFTC-US-001-CPO-CTA-REGULATION-4-7-QEP-THRESHOLDS-2024-v1-008/.
Plain text Download
RegLeg Specialist Panel (2026). "Finding#2 . Misattributed Commission vote and named non-sitting commissioner — Practitioners — Lawyers." Citation ID: RLB-F-US-CFTC-CPO-CTA-REGULATION-4-7-QEP-THRESHOLDS-2024-Q008. RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research, published 2026-06-11. https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j3/us/cftc/cpo-cta-regulation-4-7-qep-thresholds-2024/practitioners/lawyers/finding/US-CFTC-US-001-CPO-CTA-REGULATION-4-7-QEP-THRESHOLDS-2024-v1-008/
APA 7th edition Download
RegLeg Specialist Panel. (2026). Finding#2 . Misattributed Commission vote and named non-sitting commissioner [Hallucination finding RLB-F-US-CFTC-CPO-CTA-REGULATION-4-7-QEP-THRESHOLDS-2024-Q008]. RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research. https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j3/us/cftc/cpo-cta-regulation-4-7-qep-thresholds-2024/practitioners/lawyers/finding/US-CFTC-US-001-CPO-CTA-REGULATION-4-7-QEP-THRESHOLDS-2024-v1-008/
BibTeX Download
@misc{reglegbrief_RLB_F_US_CFTC_CPO_CTA_REGULATION_4_7_QEP_THRESHOLDS_2024_Q008,
  author    = {RegLeg Specialist Panel},
  title     = {Finding#2 . Misattributed Commission vote and named non-sitting commissioner},
  year      = {2026},
  publisher = {RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research},
  note      = {Hallucination finding Citation ID: RLB-F-US-CFTC-CPO-CTA-REGULATION-4-7-QEP-THRESHOLDS-2024-Q008},
  url       = {https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j3/us/cftc/cpo-cta-regulation-4-7-qep-thresholds-2024/practitioners/lawyers/finding/US-CFTC-US-001-CPO-CTA-REGULATION-4-7-QEP-THRESHOLDS-2024-v1-008/}
}
← Back to case study summary Case study detail →

Every finding on this page compares an AI subject's account of the rule against the regulator's verbatim text from the regulator's own portal. Both are linked. Each delta, its root causes, and impact analysis are documented and published with immutable Citation IDs.