AI Hallucination ResearchAudiencesPractitionersUnited StatesFinancial AdvisersDetail › Finding
Practitioners — Financial Advisers · updated 2026-06-11
Share / Print Twitter LinkedIn Email

Finding#2 . NPRM-stage CPI-U buying-power figures invented

RLB Citation ID: RLB-F-US-CFTC-CPO-CTA-REGULATION-4-7-QEP-THRESHOLDS-2024-Q011
What the RLB Specialist Panel found

Finding#2 . NPRM-stage CPI-U buying-power figures invented

  • Citation ID: RLB-H-US-CFTC-CPO-CTA-REGULATION-4-7-QEP-THRESHOLDS-2024-Q011-Sonnet46
  • AI's failure: AI invented February-2023 buying-power figures that the NPRM does not record
  • Risk for the Financial Advisers: Operational decision-support exposure on testimony, technical notes, and economist deliverables that quote AI-supplied CPI-U figures For financial advisers working on CFTC Regulation 4.7 matters, the AI's stated answer reads as a verbatim quotation that a practitioner would paste into a memo, register entry, or client deliverable before verification against the source. The regulator's own text, however, records a different position. The NPRM pre-print PDF records, using CPI-U data as of February 2023, that the $2,000,000 threshold in the Securities Portfolio Test has the same buying power as approximately $4,270,000, and the $200,000 threshold in the Initial Margin and Premiums Test has the same buying power as approximately $427,000. Sonnet 4.6 reported $4,070,000 and $407,000 for the same reference month. The 5 percent gap between the AI's figures and the regulator's stated figures cannot be reconciled to any CPI-U release; the answer is invented under the appearance of a precise quotation. For a financial adviser preparing client communications on the amended QEP regime, the AI's verbatim-looking figure or rule would enter the client communication, with the adviser believing it tracks the regulator's source text.
  • see this finding ->
References — raw findings (per AI model)
← Previous finding Finding#1 . Misstated grandfather rule for existing QEP investors under prior thresholds Next finding → Finding#3 . July 2024 CPI-U buying-power figures invented (Opus 4.7)
Cite this finding

Each finding has a stable Citation ID (RLB-F-… for aggregated case-study findings, RLB-H-… for raw per-model hallucinations) — like a DOI, the ID always resolves to the canonical finding even if URLs change.

RLB Citation ID: RLB-F-US-CFTC-CPO-CTA-REGULATION-4-7-QEP-THRESHOLDS-2024-Q011
Plain text Download
RegLeg Specialist Panel (2026). "Finding#2 . NPRM-stage CPI-U buying-power figures invented — Practitioners — Financial Advisers." Citation ID: RLB-F-US-CFTC-CPO-CTA-REGULATION-4-7-QEP-THRESHOLDS-2024-Q011. RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research, published 2026-06-11. https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j3/us/cftc/cpo-cta-regulation-4-7-qep-thresholds-2024/practitioners/financial-advisers/finding/US-CFTC-US-001-CPO-CTA-REGULATION-4-7-QEP-THRESHOLDS-2024-v1-011/
APA 7th edition Download
RegLeg Specialist Panel. (2026). Finding#2 . NPRM-stage CPI-U buying-power figures invented [Hallucination finding RLB-F-US-CFTC-CPO-CTA-REGULATION-4-7-QEP-THRESHOLDS-2024-Q011]. RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research. https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j3/us/cftc/cpo-cta-regulation-4-7-qep-thresholds-2024/practitioners/financial-advisers/finding/US-CFTC-US-001-CPO-CTA-REGULATION-4-7-QEP-THRESHOLDS-2024-v1-011/
Bluebook / OSCOLA (US + UK legal) Download
RegLeg Specialist Panel, Finding#2 . NPRM-stage CPI-U buying-power figures invented [RLB-F-US-CFTC-CPO-CTA-REGULATION-4-7-QEP-THRESHOLDS-2024-Q011], RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research (June 11, 2026), https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j3/us/cftc/cpo-cta-regulation-4-7-qep-thresholds-2024/practitioners/financial-advisers/finding/US-CFTC-US-001-CPO-CTA-REGULATION-4-7-QEP-THRESHOLDS-2024-v1-011/.
BibTeX Download
@misc{reglegbrief_RLB_F_US_CFTC_CPO_CTA_REGULATION_4_7_QEP_THRESHOLDS_2024_Q011,
  author    = {RegLeg Specialist Panel},
  title     = {Finding#2 . NPRM-stage CPI-U buying-power figures invented},
  year      = {2026},
  publisher = {RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research},
  note      = {Hallucination finding Citation ID: RLB-F-US-CFTC-CPO-CTA-REGULATION-4-7-QEP-THRESHOLDS-2024-Q011},
  url       = {https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j3/us/cftc/cpo-cta-regulation-4-7-qep-thresholds-2024/practitioners/financial-advisers/finding/US-CFTC-US-001-CPO-CTA-REGULATION-4-7-QEP-THRESHOLDS-2024-v1-011/}
}
← Back to case study summary Case study detail →

Every finding on this page compares an AI subject's account of the rule against the regulator's verbatim text from the regulator's own portal. Both are linked. Each delta, its root causes, and impact analysis are documented and published with immutable Citation IDs.