AI Hallucination Research › Findings by audience › Practitioners › International / Multilateral › Company Secretaries › Detail › Finding
Practitioners — Company Secretaries · Last updated 11 Jun 2026 · Hallucination Register
Share / Print X LinkedIn Email

Finding#3 . 'Secure the periphery, protect the core' misattributed to 2018 wholesale-payments work

RLB Citation ID: RLB-F-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-CYBER-RESILIENCE-FMI-2016-Q014
AI's failure:Misattributed Risk for Company Secretaries:Wrong deliverable on cybersecurity framework alignment
What the RLB Specialist Panel found

Finding#3 . 'Secure the periphery, protect the core' misattributed to 2018 wholesale-payments work

  • Citation ID: RLB-H-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-CYBER-RESILIENCE-FMI-2016-Q014-Opus47
  • AI's failure: AI attributed a slogan to the wrong CPMI publication
  • Risk for the Company Secretaries: Board paper accuracy exposure on cyber programme alignment and operative-standard status For company secretaries preparing board cyber-strategy briefings, attributing 'secure the periphery, protect the core' to the 2016 guidance or the 2018 fraud paper introduces a source attribution that does not match the regulator record. The phrase is from a 2018 speech, not a guidance or standards document. The paper reads as well-cited until a director or audit-committee member tests the attribution.
  • see this finding ->
Impact for Company Secretaries in international jurisdictions advising on the Guidance on Cyber Resilience for Financial Market Infrastructures (CPMI-IOSCO 2016)

For company secretaries preparing board cyber-strategy briefings, attributing 'secure the periphery, protect the core' to the 2016 guidance or the 2018 fraud paper introduces a source attribution that does not match the regulator record. The phrase is from a 2018 speech, not a guidance or standards document. The paper reads as well-cited until a director or audit-committee member tests the attribution.

References — raw findings (per AI model)
This finding also affects
← Previous finding Finding#2 . NIST Cybersecurity Framework citation asserted as explicit Next finding → Finding#4 . 'Secure the periphery, protect the core' misattributed to May 2019 BIS-CPMI speech
Cite this finding

Each finding has a stable Citation ID (RLB-F-… for aggregated case-study findings, RLB-H-… for raw per-model hallucinations) — like a DOI, the ID always resolves to the canonical finding even if URLs change.

RLB Citation ID: RLB-F-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-CYBER-RESILIENCE-FMI-2016-Q014
Plain text Download 
RegLeg Specialist Panel (2026). "Finding#3 . 'Secure the periphery, protect the core' misattributed to 2018 wholesale-payments work — Practitioners — Company Secretaries." Citation ID: RLB-F-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-CYBER-RESILIENCE-FMI-2016-Q014. RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research, published 2026-06-11. https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j1/int/BIS-CPMI/CPMI-IOSCO-CYBER-RESILIENCE-FMI-2016/practitioners/company-secretaries/finding/INT-BIS-CPMI-INT-001-CPMI-IOSCO-CYBER-RESILIENCE-FMI-2016-v1-014/
APA 7th edition Download 
RegLeg Specialist Panel. (2026). Finding#3 . 'Secure the periphery, protect the core' misattributed to 2018 wholesale-payments work [Hallucination finding RLB-F-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-CYBER-RESILIENCE-FMI-2016-Q014]. RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research. https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j1/int/BIS-CPMI/CPMI-IOSCO-CYBER-RESILIENCE-FMI-2016/practitioners/company-secretaries/finding/INT-BIS-CPMI-INT-001-CPMI-IOSCO-CYBER-RESILIENCE-FMI-2016-v1-014/
Bluebook / OSCOLA (US + UK legal) Download 
RegLeg Specialist Panel, Finding#3 . 'Secure the periphery, protect the core' misattributed to 2018 wholesale-payments work [RLB-F-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-CYBER-RESILIENCE-FMI-2016-Q014], RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research (June 11, 2026), https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j1/int/BIS-CPMI/CPMI-IOSCO-CYBER-RESILIENCE-FMI-2016/practitioners/company-secretaries/finding/INT-BIS-CPMI-INT-001-CPMI-IOSCO-CYBER-RESILIENCE-FMI-2016-v1-014/.
BibTeX Download 
@misc{reglegbrief_RLB_F_INT_BIS_CPMI_IOSCO_CYBER_RESILIENCE_FMI_2016_Q014,
  author    = {RegLeg Specialist Panel},
  title     = {Finding#3 . 'Secure the periphery, protect the core' misattributed to 2018 wholesale-payments work},
  year      = {2026},
  publisher = {RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research},
  note      = {Hallucination finding Citation ID: RLB-F-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-CYBER-RESILIENCE-FMI-2016-Q014},
  url       = {https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j1/int/BIS-CPMI/CPMI-IOSCO-CYBER-RESILIENCE-FMI-2016/practitioners/company-secretaries/finding/INT-BIS-CPMI-INT-001-CPMI-IOSCO-CYBER-RESILIENCE-FMI-2016-v1-014/}
}
← Back to case study summary Case study detail →
About Citation IDs →

Every finding on this page compares an AI subject's account of the rule against the regulator's verbatim text from the regulator's own portal. Both are linked. Each delta, its root causes, and impact analysis are documented and published with immutable Citation IDs.