Practitioners — Company Secretaries · Last updated 11 Jun 2026 · Hallucination Register

Finding#8 . 2016 guidance presented as unrevised in 2026, missing the May 2026 consultation

RLB Citation ID: RLB-F-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-CYBER-RESILIENCE-FMI-2016-Q022

AI's failure:Outdated Risk for Company Secretaries:Wrong deliverable on cybersecurity framework alignment

What the RLB Specialist Panel found

Finding#8 . 2016 guidance presented as unrevised in 2026, missing the May 2026 consultation

Citation ID: RLB-H-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-CYBER-RESILIENCE-FMI-2016-Q022-Opus47
AI's failure: AI missed an active CPMI-IOSCO consultation on revised guidance
Risk for the Company Secretaries: Board paper accuracy exposure on cyber programme alignment and operative-standard status For company secretaries running the regulator horizon-scanning pack, missing the May 2026 CPMI-IOSCO consultative document removes an open consultation from the horizon scan. A pack that records the 2016 guidance as standing without active revision misleads the board on the live regulatory state and removes the consultation-response obligation from the audit-committee work plan for the period.
see this finding ->

Impact for Company Secretaries in international jurisdictions advising on the Guidance on Cyber Resilience for Financial Market Infrastructures (CPMI-IOSCO 2016)

For company secretaries running the regulator horizon-scanning pack, missing the May 2026 CPMI-IOSCO consultative document removes an open consultation from the horizon scan. A pack that records the 2016 guidance as standing without active revision misleads the board on the live regulatory state and removes the consultation-response obligation from the audit-committee work plan for the period.

References — raw findings (per AI model)

RLB-H-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-CYBER-RESILIENCE-FMI-2016-Q022-Opus47 Claude Opus 4.7 (web search on)
RLB-H-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-CYBER-RESILIENCE-FMI-2016-Q022-Sonnet46 Claude Sonnet 4.6 (web search on)

This finding also affects

← Previous finding Finding#7 . FSB Cyber Lexicon derivation claim added beyond the source text Next finding → Finding#9 . 2016 guidance presented as ongoing monitoring only, missing the May 2026 consultative document

Cite this finding

Each finding has a stable Citation ID (RLB-F-… for aggregated case-study findings, RLB-H-… for raw per-model hallucinations) — like a DOI, the ID always resolves to the canonical finding even if URLs change.

RLB Citation ID: RLB-F-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-CYBER-RESILIENCE-FMI-2016-Q022

Plain text Download

RegLeg Specialist Panel (2026). "Finding#8 . 2016 guidance presented as unrevised in 2026, missing the May 2026 consultation — Practitioners — Company Secretaries." Citation ID: RLB-F-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-CYBER-RESILIENCE-FMI-2016-Q022. RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research, published 2026-06-11. https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j1/INT/BIS-CPMI/CPMI-IOSCO-CYBER-RESILIENCE-FMI-2016/practitioners/company-secretaries/finding/INT-BIS-CPMI-INT-001-CPMI-IOSCO-CYBER-RESILIENCE-FMI-2016-v1-022/

APA 7th edition Download

RegLeg Specialist Panel. (2026). Finding#8 . 2016 guidance presented as unrevised in 2026, missing the May 2026 consultation [Hallucination finding RLB-F-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-CYBER-RESILIENCE-FMI-2016-Q022]. RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research. https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j1/INT/BIS-CPMI/CPMI-IOSCO-CYBER-RESILIENCE-FMI-2016/practitioners/company-secretaries/finding/INT-BIS-CPMI-INT-001-CPMI-IOSCO-CYBER-RESILIENCE-FMI-2016-v1-022/

Bluebook / OSCOLA (US + UK legal) Download

RegLeg Specialist Panel, Finding#8 . 2016 guidance presented as unrevised in 2026, missing the May 2026 consultation [RLB-F-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-CYBER-RESILIENCE-FMI-2016-Q022], RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research (June 11, 2026), https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j1/INT/BIS-CPMI/CPMI-IOSCO-CYBER-RESILIENCE-FMI-2016/practitioners/company-secretaries/finding/INT-BIS-CPMI-INT-001-CPMI-IOSCO-CYBER-RESILIENCE-FMI-2016-v1-022/.

BibTeX Download

@misc{reglegbrief_RLB_F_INT_BIS_CPMI_IOSCO_CYBER_RESILIENCE_FMI_2016_Q022,
  author    = {RegLeg Specialist Panel},
  title     = {Finding#8 . 2016 guidance presented as unrevised in 2026, missing the May 2026 consultation},
  year      = {2026},
  publisher = {RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research},
  note      = {Hallucination finding Citation ID: RLB-F-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-CYBER-RESILIENCE-FMI-2016-Q022},
  url       = {https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j1/INT/BIS-CPMI/CPMI-IOSCO-CYBER-RESILIENCE-FMI-2016/practitioners/company-secretaries/finding/INT-BIS-CPMI-INT-001-CPMI-IOSCO-CYBER-RESILIENCE-FMI-2016-v1-022/}
}

← Back to case study summary Case study detail →

About Citation IDs →

Every finding on this page compares an AI subject's account of the rule against the regulator's verbatim text from the regulator's own portal. Both are linked. Each delta, its root causes, and impact analysis are documented and published with immutable Citation IDs.