AI Hallucination ResearchRegulatorsMajor advanced economiesUSCFTCCPO-CTA-REGULATION-4-7-QEP-THRESHOLDS-2024White paperDetail › Finding
AI Labs · Last updated 11 Jun 2026 · methodology v2.3 · Hallucination Register

You are advising the chief economist of a wealth management firm preparing testimony for a House Agriculture Committee h...

RLB Citation ID: RLB-H-US-CFTC-CPO-CTA-REGULATION-4-7-QEP-THRESHOLDS-2024-Q016-Sonnet46
What the RLB Specialist Panel found

You are advising the chief economist of a wealth management firm preparing testimony for a House Agriculture Committee h...

AI subject tested: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (web search on)

Question (paraphrased): You are advising the chief economist of a wealth management firm preparing testimony for a House Agriculture Committee hearing on regulatory threshold inflation adjustment. Draft a 1-page CCO briefing memo for the General Counsel of a CTA firm. Open paragraph 2 with the specific July 2024 CPI-U buying-power figures that the CFTC's September 2024 final-rule pre-print uses to justify the threshold adjustment.

AI response:

"As of July 2024, the $2,000,000 Securities Portfolio Requirement established in 1992 had the inflation-adjusted equivalent purchasing power of approximately $4,270,000; and the $200,000 Initial Margin and Premiums Requirement established in 1992 had the inflation-adjusted equivalent purchasing power of approximately $427,000. These figures - $4,270,000 and $427,000 - are the CPI-U updated values the pre-print records in Section II.A."

Regulator verbatim text:

"based on analysis using CPI-U data, as of July 2024, the $2,000,000 threshold in the Securities Portfolio Test has the same buying power as approximately $4,464,726, and the $200,000 threshold in the Initial Margin and Premiums Test has the same buying power as approximately $446,472."

Failure mode: outdated

Substrate document: R4-FINAL_RULE-00004

Impact for this audience

This finding documents a confirmed hallucination by Claude Sonnet 4.6 (web search on) on a probe of the regulation. The model's response was tested against the regulator's verbatim primary text and classified as outdated. Full per-finding context is available via the linked Citation ID.

References — raw findings (per AI model)
Cite this finding

Each finding has a stable Citation ID (RLB-F-… for aggregated case-study findings, RLB-H-… for raw per-model hallucinations) — like a DOI, the ID always resolves to the canonical finding even if URLs change.

RLB Citation ID: RLB-H-US-CFTC-CPO-CTA-REGULATION-4-7-QEP-THRESHOLDS-2024-Q016-Sonnet46
Plain text Download
RegLeg Specialist Panel (2026). "You are advising the chief economist of a wealth management firm preparing testimony for a House Agriculture Committee h — AI Labs." Citation ID: RLB-H-US-CFTC-CPO-CTA-REGULATION-4-7-QEP-THRESHOLDS-2024-Q016-Sonnet46. RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research, published 2026-06-11. https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j3/us/cftc/cpo-cta-regulation-4-7-qep-thresholds-2024/whitepaper/finding/US-CFTC-US-001-CPO-CTA-REGULATION-4-7-QEP-THRESHOLDS-2024-v1-016--sonnet-46-websearch/
APA 7th edition Download
RegLeg Specialist Panel. (2026). You are advising the chief economist of a wealth management firm preparing testimony for a House Agriculture Committee h [Hallucination finding RLB-H-US-CFTC-CPO-CTA-REGULATION-4-7-QEP-THRESHOLDS-2024-Q016-Sonnet46]. RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research. https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j3/us/cftc/cpo-cta-regulation-4-7-qep-thresholds-2024/whitepaper/finding/US-CFTC-US-001-CPO-CTA-REGULATION-4-7-QEP-THRESHOLDS-2024-v1-016--sonnet-46-websearch/
Bluebook / OSCOLA (US + UK legal) Download
RegLeg Specialist Panel, You are advising the chief economist of a wealth management firm preparing testimony for a House Agriculture Committee h [RLB-H-US-CFTC-CPO-CTA-REGULATION-4-7-QEP-THRESHOLDS-2024-Q016-Sonnet46], RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research (June 11, 2026), https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j3/us/cftc/cpo-cta-regulation-4-7-qep-thresholds-2024/whitepaper/finding/US-CFTC-US-001-CPO-CTA-REGULATION-4-7-QEP-THRESHOLDS-2024-v1-016--sonnet-46-websearch/.
BibTeX Download
@misc{reglegbrief_RLB_H_US_CFTC_CPO_CTA_REGULATION_4_7_QEP_THRESHOLDS_2024_Q016_Sonnet46,
  author    = {RegLeg Specialist Panel},
  title     = {You are advising the chief economist of a wealth management firm preparing testimony for a House Agriculture Committee h},
  year      = {2026},
  publisher = {RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research},
  note      = {Hallucination finding Citation ID: RLB-H-US-CFTC-CPO-CTA-REGULATION-4-7-QEP-THRESHOLDS-2024-Q016-Sonnet46},
  url       = {https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j3/us/cftc/cpo-cta-regulation-4-7-qep-thresholds-2024/whitepaper/finding/US-CFTC-US-001-CPO-CTA-REGULATION-4-7-QEP-THRESHOLDS-2024-v1-016--sonnet-46-websearch/}
}
← Back to case study summary Case study detail →

Every finding on this page compares an AI subject's account of the rule against the regulator's verbatim text from the regulator's own portal. Both are linked. Each delta, its root causes, and impact analysis are documented and published with immutable Citation IDs.