Mainboard Issuers × Legal — United Kingdom · Last updated 11 Jun 2026 · Hallucination Register

Finding#2 . Reversed the PRIN 2A scope exclusion for group insurance distribution

RLB Citation ID: RLB-F-GB-FCA-CONSUMER-DUTY-PS22-9-Q018

AI's failure:Misstated Rule Risk for Mainboard Issuers × Legal:Regulatory enforcement / professional liability exposure

What the RLB Specialist Panel found

Finding#2 . Reversed the PRIN 2A scope exclusion for group insurance distribution

Citation ID: RLB-H-GB-FCA-CONSUMER-DUTY-PS22-9-Q018-Opus47
AI's failure: AI inverted an express scope exclusion and cited a placeholder consultation paper
Risk for Legal x Mainboard / Premium-Listed Issuers: Regulatory enforcement and operational-decision exposure where the FCA's text resolves the question differently Mainboard / Premium-Listed Issuers legal teams advising on the application of the Consumer Duty across the group's insurance distribution business need the PRIN 2A.1.8R exclusion preserved. The model's reversal would, if adopted in a scope opinion, drive the group to apply Duty obligations to excluded activities and inflate compliance cost across multiple subsidiaries.
see this finding ->

Impact for Legal Teams in Mainboard / Premium-Listed Issuers Sector in the United Kingdom working with the Consumer Duty (PS22/9 + PRIN 2A)

Mainboard / Premium-Listed Issuers legal teams advising on the application of the Consumer Duty across the group's insurance distribution business need the PRIN 2A.1.8R exclusion preserved. The model's reversal would, if adopted in a scope opinion, drive the group to apply Duty obligations to excluded activities and inflate compliance cost across multiple subsidiaries.

References — raw findings (per AI model)

RLB-H-GB-FCA-CONSUMER-DUTY-PS22-9-Q018-Opus47 Claude Opus 4.7 (web search on)

This finding also affects

← Previous finding Finding#1 . Misstated FSMA 2023 role in creating the Consumer Duty

Cite this finding

Each finding has a stable Citation ID (RLB-F-… for aggregated case-study findings, RLB-H-… for raw per-model hallucinations) — like a DOI, the ID always resolves to the canonical finding even if URLs change.

RLB Citation ID: RLB-F-GB-FCA-CONSUMER-DUTY-PS22-9-Q018

Plain text Download

RegLeg Specialist Panel (2026). "Finding#2 . Reversed the PRIN 2A scope exclusion for group insurance distribution — Mainboard Issuers × Legal — United Kingdom." Citation ID: RLB-F-GB-FCA-CONSUMER-DUTY-PS22-9-Q018. RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research, published 2026-06-11. https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j3/gb/FCA/CONSUMER-DUTY-PS22-9/sectors/mainboard_issuers/legal/finding/GB-FCA-GB-001-CONSUMER-DUTY-PS22-9-v1-018/

APA 7th edition Download

RegLeg Specialist Panel. (2026). Finding#2 . Reversed the PRIN 2A scope exclusion for group insurance distribution [Hallucination finding RLB-F-GB-FCA-CONSUMER-DUTY-PS22-9-Q018]. RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research. https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j3/gb/FCA/CONSUMER-DUTY-PS22-9/sectors/mainboard_issuers/legal/finding/GB-FCA-GB-001-CONSUMER-DUTY-PS22-9-v1-018/

Bluebook / OSCOLA (US + UK legal) Download

RegLeg Specialist Panel, Finding#2 . Reversed the PRIN 2A scope exclusion for group insurance distribution [RLB-F-GB-FCA-CONSUMER-DUTY-PS22-9-Q018], RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research (June 11, 2026), https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j3/gb/FCA/CONSUMER-DUTY-PS22-9/sectors/mainboard_issuers/legal/finding/GB-FCA-GB-001-CONSUMER-DUTY-PS22-9-v1-018/.

BibTeX Download

@misc{reglegbrief_RLB_F_GB_FCA_CONSUMER_DUTY_PS22_9_Q018,
  author    = {RegLeg Specialist Panel},
  title     = {Finding#2 . Reversed the PRIN 2A scope exclusion for group insurance distribution},
  year      = {2026},
  publisher = {RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research},
  note      = {Hallucination finding Citation ID: RLB-F-GB-FCA-CONSUMER-DUTY-PS22-9-Q018},
  url       = {https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j3/gb/FCA/CONSUMER-DUTY-PS22-9/sectors/mainboard_issuers/legal/finding/GB-FCA-GB-001-CONSUMER-DUTY-PS22-9-v1-018/}
}

← Back to case study summary Case study detail →

About Citation IDs →

Every finding on this page compares an AI subject's account of the rule against the regulator's verbatim text from the regulator's own portal. Both are linked. Each delta, its root causes, and impact analysis are documented and published with immutable Citation IDs.