This is the consolidated view of findings. Click the Citation IDs or 'see details →' on any item for the full details for each finding.
A Financial Adviser using AI to establish the reform's baseline scope receives a figure — 19 surcharge-paying countries before November 2024 — that is wrong by one, with the correct number being 20. That single-digit error ripples through any analysis: immediate relief is stated as 8 countries rather than 9, FY2026 projections rest on a wrong comparator, and advice to a sovereign client on the reform's peer-country dimension is factually off.
The added liability is the AI's citation behaviour: the tools tested cited a genuine IMF press release as the source for '19 to 11', a citation a client or counterpart might follow and find does not actually support the stated figure — raising questions about the quality of due diligence behind the advice.
Every finding on this page compares an AI subject's account of the rule against the regulator's verbatim text from the regulator's own portal. Both are linked. Each delta, its root causes, and impact analysis are documented and published with immutable Citation IDs.