AI Hallucination ResearchRegulatorsGlobal standard-settersINTBIS-CPMICPMI-IOSCO-PFMI-L3-GENERAL-BUSINESS-RISK-2025White paperDetail › Finding
AI Labs · Last updated 7 Jun 2026 · methodology vv2.3 · Hallucination Register

A capital management team at a major CCP is preparing an annual LNAFE sufficiency review

RLB Citation ID: RLB-H-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-PFMI-L3-GENERAL-BUSINESS-RISK-2025-Q002-Sonnet46
What the RLB Specialist Panel found

A capital management team at a major CCP is preparing an annual LNAFE sufficiency review

AI subject tested: Claude Sonnet 4.6 (web search on)

Question (paraphrased): A capital management team at a major CCP is preparing an annual LNAFE sufficiency review. Provide an internal policy note specifying what capital instruments qualify toward LNAFE under PFMI Principle 15 Key Consideration 3, what must be held separately, and whether equity already held in compliance with international risk-based capital standards such as Basel or CRD frameworks can be counted toward LNAFE or must be held on top.

AI response:

"KC3 of PFMI Principle 15 does NOT include any carve-out or exception for equity held under international risk-based capital standards such as Basel CET1. KC3 is the segregation requirement, not the equity-type or asset-quality provision."

Regulator verbatim text:

"However, equity held under international risk-based capital standards can be included where relevant and appropriate to avoid duplicate capital requirements."

Failure mode: inference_drift

Substrate document: p_03_NOTICE_d228_Annex_A_reproducing_PFMI_Principle_p251107.htm

Impact for this audience

This finding documents a confirmed hallucination by Claude Sonnet 4.6 (web search on) on a probe of the regulation. The model's response was tested against the regulator's verbatim primary text and classified as inference_drift. Full per-finding context is available via the linked Citation ID.

References — raw findings (per AI model)
This finding also affects
Cite this finding

Each finding has a stable Citation ID (RLB-F-… for aggregated case-study findings, RLB-H-… for raw per-model hallucinations) — like a DOI, the ID always resolves to the canonical finding even if URLs change.

RLB Citation ID: RLB-H-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-PFMI-L3-GENERAL-BUSINESS-RISK-2025-Q002-Sonnet46
Plain text Download
RegLeg Specialist Panel (2026). "A capital management team at a major CCP is preparing an annual LNAFE sufficiency review — AI Labs." Citation ID: RLB-H-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-PFMI-L3-GENERAL-BUSINESS-RISK-2025-Q002-Sonnet46. RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research, published 2026-06-07. https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j1/int/bis-cpmi/cpmi-iosco-pfmi-l3-general-business-risk-2025/whitepaper/finding/INT-BIS-CPMI-INT-001-CPMI-IOSCO-PFMI-L3-GENERAL-BUSINESS-RISK-2025-v1-002--sonnet-46-websearch/
APA 7th edition Download
RegLeg Specialist Panel. (2026). A capital management team at a major CCP is preparing an annual LNAFE sufficiency review [Hallucination finding RLB-H-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-PFMI-L3-GENERAL-BUSINESS-RISK-2025-Q002-Sonnet46]. RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research. https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j1/int/bis-cpmi/cpmi-iosco-pfmi-l3-general-business-risk-2025/whitepaper/finding/INT-BIS-CPMI-INT-001-CPMI-IOSCO-PFMI-L3-GENERAL-BUSINESS-RISK-2025-v1-002--sonnet-46-websearch/
Bluebook / OSCOLA (US + UK legal) Download
RegLeg Specialist Panel, A capital management team at a major CCP is preparing an annual LNAFE sufficiency review [RLB-H-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-PFMI-L3-GENERAL-BUSINESS-RISK-2025-Q002-Sonnet46], RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research (June 07, 2026), https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j1/int/bis-cpmi/cpmi-iosco-pfmi-l3-general-business-risk-2025/whitepaper/finding/INT-BIS-CPMI-INT-001-CPMI-IOSCO-PFMI-L3-GENERAL-BUSINESS-RISK-2025-v1-002--sonnet-46-websearch/.
BibTeX Download
@misc{reglegbrief_RLB_H_INT_BIS_CPMI_IOSCO_PFMI_L3_GENERAL_BUSINESS_RISK_2025_Q002_Sonnet46,
  author    = {RegLeg Specialist Panel},
  title     = {A capital management team at a major CCP is preparing an annual LNAFE sufficiency review},
  year      = {2026},
  publisher = {RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research},
  note      = {Hallucination finding Citation ID: RLB-H-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-PFMI-L3-GENERAL-BUSINESS-RISK-2025-Q002-Sonnet46},
  url       = {https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j1/int/bis-cpmi/cpmi-iosco-pfmi-l3-general-business-risk-2025/whitepaper/finding/INT-BIS-CPMI-INT-001-CPMI-IOSCO-PFMI-L3-GENERAL-BUSINESS-RISK-2025-v1-002--sonnet-46-websearch/}
}
← Back to case study summary Case study detail →

Every finding on this page compares an AI subject's account of the rule against the regulator's verbatim text from the regulator's own portal. Both are linked. Each delta, its root causes, and impact analysis are documented and published with immutable Citation IDs.