AI Hallucination ResearchAudiencesSectorsSingaporeRetail Banking › Treasury
Retail Banking × Treasury — Singapore · published 2026-05-28 · methodology v2.1

AI Hallucinations Affecting Treasury at Retail Banking Firms in Singapore

Findings — impact summary

This is the consolidated view of findings. Click 'see details →' on any item for the full details for each finding.

  1. Finding 1. Divisional structure of Part VI in MAS Notice 637

    A Treasury analyst who accepts the AI's characterisation of Division 4 of Part VI without verification may direct capital instrument classification or reporting work to the wrong part of MAS Notice 637, resulting in obligations being missed or misapplied. If this error propagates into an ICAAP document, a capital policy framework, or a regulatory submission to MAS, the firm faces the cost of identifying and correcting the error, potential re-submission of affected documents, and supervisory scrutiny from MAS under its powers to require remediation of capital adequacy deficiencies. MAS has broad supervisory authority over banks incorporated in Singapore, and inaccuracies in capital-related regulatory submissions are treated as indicators of governance weakness as well as substantive compliance failures.

    see details →
← Other sector case studies in Singapore The detailed Case study →