AI Hallucination ResearchAudiencesSectorsSingaporeRetail Banking › Finance
Retail Banking × Finance — Singapore · published 2026-05-28 · methodology v2.1

AI Hallucinations Affecting Finance at Retail Banking Firms in Singapore

Findings — impact summary

This is the consolidated view of findings. Click 'see details →' on any item for the full details for each finding.

  1. Finding 1. Divisional structure of Part VI in MAS Notice 637

    A Finance team that accepts the AI's characterisation of Division 4 of Part VI without independent verification against the published Notice could embed that mischaracterisation into internal capital-adequacy guidance, staff training, or regulatory mapping documents. If those materials then inform how the bank structures its capital instrument reporting or interprets its obligations under that Division, the error becomes operational: capital calculations, regulatory returns, and ICAAP documentation may all rest on a structurally incorrect reading of the Notice. MAS has the power to require remediation of reporting failures, impose additional capital requirements, and take enforcement action under the Banking Act, and the costs of correcting downstream documentation — alongside any supervisory consequence — fall entirely on the firm.

    see details →
← Other sector case studies in Singapore The detailed Case study →