AI Hallucination ResearchRegulatorsGlobal standard-settersINTBIS-CPMICPMI-IOSCO-PFMI-2012White paperDetail › Finding
AI Labs · updated 2026-05-29 · methodology v2.1

Finding on 'Q027 Probe' for Claude Opus 4.7 with web search ON

RLB Citation ID: RLB-H-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-PFMI-2012-Q027-Opus47
What the RLB Specialist Panel found

Finding on 'Q027 Probe' for Claude Opus 4.7 with web search ON

  • Question (paraphrased to protect IP): What specific verbatim text, thresholds, or cross-references appear in the IOSCO version of the PFMI disclosure framework and assessment methodology?
  • AI's response: "I do not have verbatim access to IOSCOPD396…I will not produce verbatim text or paragraph references from the PDF as I cannot confirm them without re-reading the binary directly."
  • Regulator's text: [Not provided — verbatim-access question]
  • Why the AI went wrong: The model correctly declined to fabricate verbatim content from a PDF it could not retrieve. As with the parallel finding on IOSCOPD377, the model cited the inaccessible PDF URL while simultaneously acknowledging it could not access the document — a citation pattern that could mislead a reader into treating the URL as a verified source.
  • Cited source(s):
  • https://www.iosco.org/library/pubdocs/pdf/IOSCOPD396.pdf — Pretextual
Impact for this audience

Same citation-alongside-refusal pattern as finding 26. The IOSCO disclosure framework and assessment methodology (IOSCOPD396) is a document that alignment and evals teams should specifically target with verbatim-paragraph probes — it contains the formal rating scale whose miscategorisation appeared in finding 9, and it is the kind of technical document that is underrepresented in training corpora relative to its regulatory importance.

← Previous finding Finding on 'Q026 Probe' for Claude Opus 4.7 with web search ON Next finding → Finding on 'Q005 Probe' for Claude Sonnet 4.6 with web search ON
Cite this finding

Each finding has a stable Citation ID (RLB-F-… for aggregated case-study findings, RLB-H-… for raw per-model hallucinations) — like a DOI, the ID always resolves to the canonical finding even if URLs change.

RLB Citation ID: RLB-H-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-PFMI-2012-Q027-Opus47
Plain text Download
RegLeg Specialist Panel (2026). "Finding on 'Q027 Probe' for Claude Opus 4.7 with web search ON — AI Labs." Citation ID: RLB-H-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-PFMI-2012-Q027-Opus47. RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research, published 2026-05-29. https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j1/int/bis-cpmi/cpmi-iosco-pfmi-2012/whitepaper/finding/INT-BIS-CPMI-INT-001-CPMI-IOSCO-PFMI-2012-v1-l3-027--opus-47-websearch/
APA 7th edition Download
RegLeg Specialist Panel. (2026). Finding on 'Q027 Probe' for Claude Opus 4.7 with web search ON [Hallucination finding RLB-H-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-PFMI-2012-Q027-Opus47]. RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research. https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j1/int/bis-cpmi/cpmi-iosco-pfmi-2012/whitepaper/finding/INT-BIS-CPMI-INT-001-CPMI-IOSCO-PFMI-2012-v1-l3-027--opus-47-websearch/
Bluebook / OSCOLA (US + UK legal) Download
RegLeg Specialist Panel, Finding on 'Q027 Probe' for Claude Opus 4.7 with web search ON [RLB-H-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-PFMI-2012-Q027-Opus47], RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research (May 29, 2026), https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j1/int/bis-cpmi/cpmi-iosco-pfmi-2012/whitepaper/finding/INT-BIS-CPMI-INT-001-CPMI-IOSCO-PFMI-2012-v1-l3-027--opus-47-websearch/.
BibTeX Download
@misc{reglegbrief_RLB_H_INT_BIS_CPMI_IOSCO_PFMI_2012_Q027_Opus47,
  author    = {RegLeg Specialist Panel},
  title     = {Finding on 'Q027 Probe' for Claude Opus 4.7 with web search ON},
  year      = {2026},
  publisher = {RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research},
  note      = {Hallucination finding Citation ID: RLB-H-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-PFMI-2012-Q027-Opus47},
  url       = {https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j1/int/bis-cpmi/cpmi-iosco-pfmi-2012/whitepaper/finding/INT-BIS-CPMI-INT-001-CPMI-IOSCO-PFMI-2012-v1-l3-027--opus-47-websearch/}
}
← Back to case study summary Case study detail →

Every finding on this page compares an AI subject's account of the rule against the regulator's verbatim text from the regulator's own portal. Both are linked. Each delta, its root causes, and impact analysis are documented and published with immutable Citation IDs.