AI Hallucination ResearchRegulatorsGlobal standard-settersINTBIS-CPMICPMI-IOSCO-PFMI-2012White paperDetail › Finding
AI Labs · updated 2026-05-29 · methodology v2.1

Finding on 'Q024 Probe' for Claude Opus 4.7 with web search ON

RLB Citation ID: RLB-H-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-PFMI-2012-Q024-Opus47
What the RLB Specialist Panel found

Finding on 'Q024 Probe' for Claude Opus 4.7 with web search ON

  • Question (paraphrased to protect IP): What specific findings does the CPMI-IOSCO Level 3 assessment on general business risks (November 2025) contain about FMI compliance with the six-month liquid net assets standard?
  • AI's response: "I do not have verbatim access to the d228 PDF…I therefore decline to assert the quoted snippet as verbatim from d228; the BIS d228 PDF should be consulted to verify exact wording."
  • Regulator's text: [Not provided — verbatim-access question]
  • Why the AI went wrong: The model correctly recognised it could not verify the specific contents of a November 2025 document and declined to produce verbatim claims. The refusal is appropriately scoped. One Pretextual citation was produced — a third-party commentary URL rather than the primary source — which represents a mild citation error even in the context of an otherwise well-calibrated refusal.
  • Cited source(s):
  • https://www.regulationtomorrow.com/2025/11/cpmi-iosco-papers-on-management-of... — Pretextual
Impact for this audience

Calibrated refusal with a minor citation inconsistency: the model declined to fabricate verbatim content but produced a Pretextual citation to a third-party commentary page. The citation generation is running even when the content generation is suppressed — this is a distinct signal about where in the generation pipeline the citation step sits relative to the content-verification step.

← Previous finding Finding on 'Q023 Probe' for Claude Opus 4.7 with web search ON Next finding → Finding on 'Q025 Probe' for Claude Opus 4.7 with web search ON
Cite this finding

Each finding has a stable Citation ID (RLB-F-… for aggregated case-study findings, RLB-H-… for raw per-model hallucinations) — like a DOI, the ID always resolves to the canonical finding even if URLs change.

RLB Citation ID: RLB-H-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-PFMI-2012-Q024-Opus47
Plain text Download
RegLeg Specialist Panel (2026). "Finding on 'Q024 Probe' for Claude Opus 4.7 with web search ON — AI Labs." Citation ID: RLB-H-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-PFMI-2012-Q024-Opus47. RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research, published 2026-05-29. https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j1/int/bis-cpmi/cpmi-iosco-pfmi-2012/whitepaper/finding/INT-BIS-CPMI-INT-001-CPMI-IOSCO-PFMI-2012-v1-l3-024--opus-47-websearch/
APA 7th edition Download
RegLeg Specialist Panel. (2026). Finding on 'Q024 Probe' for Claude Opus 4.7 with web search ON [Hallucination finding RLB-H-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-PFMI-2012-Q024-Opus47]. RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research. https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j1/int/bis-cpmi/cpmi-iosco-pfmi-2012/whitepaper/finding/INT-BIS-CPMI-INT-001-CPMI-IOSCO-PFMI-2012-v1-l3-024--opus-47-websearch/
Bluebook / OSCOLA (US + UK legal) Download
RegLeg Specialist Panel, Finding on 'Q024 Probe' for Claude Opus 4.7 with web search ON [RLB-H-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-PFMI-2012-Q024-Opus47], RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research (May 29, 2026), https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j1/int/bis-cpmi/cpmi-iosco-pfmi-2012/whitepaper/finding/INT-BIS-CPMI-INT-001-CPMI-IOSCO-PFMI-2012-v1-l3-024--opus-47-websearch/.
BibTeX Download
@misc{reglegbrief_RLB_H_INT_BIS_CPMI_IOSCO_PFMI_2012_Q024_Opus47,
  author    = {RegLeg Specialist Panel},
  title     = {Finding on 'Q024 Probe' for Claude Opus 4.7 with web search ON},
  year      = {2026},
  publisher = {RegLegBrief AI Hallucination Research},
  note      = {Hallucination finding Citation ID: RLB-H-INT-BIS-CPMI-IOSCO-PFMI-2012-Q024-Opus47},
  url       = {https://reglegbrief.com/regulators/j1/int/bis-cpmi/cpmi-iosco-pfmi-2012/whitepaper/finding/INT-BIS-CPMI-INT-001-CPMI-IOSCO-PFMI-2012-v1-l3-024--opus-47-websearch/}
}
← Back to case study summary Case study detail →

Every finding on this page compares an AI subject's account of the rule against the regulator's verbatim text from the regulator's own portal. Both are linked. Each delta, its root causes, and impact analysis are documented and published with immutable Citation IDs.